Side effects of tattoos Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Side effects of tattoos - Essay Example Tattoos are immensely harmful to the physical self of a human being. In different nations, there are different regulatory authorities that regulate different cosmetics. In the case of tattoos there is a lack of regulation and people may be subjected to injecting inks that contain materials that are harmful to their physical health. One of the most common identified side effects of tattoos is the allergic reactions caused due to materials used to create and inject tattoos. The ink that is injected into an individual’s skin comprises of metals such as nickel and lead and these metals cause allergic responses that may last for a longer period of time. There is other skin related diseases that may be caused due to injection of tattoos. These may include infections as well as tumors. Those who are involved in the business of crafting tattoos may not take precautionary measures and due to this, the customer may end up experiencing diseases such as AIDS. Tattoos can even impact the social life of an individual in a negative manner. Tattoos are used by people belonging to different backgrounds as a mark to differentiate themselves from others. Due to this individuals or groups having a biased opinion against the group whose tattoo is crafted on an individual may end up disliking the individual or alienate them. On the other hand, tattoos are most commonly worn by a gangster to exhibit their membership with a particular gang (Clements 46). Therefore, it is quite possible that people may remain away from them because they might fear them.

America's Nuclear Meltdown towards Global Zero Essay

America's Nuclear Meltdown towards Global Zero - Essay Example †¢ Most important concepts, theories, or ideas needed to understand & solve problem? In order to understand the reluctance of countries towards achieving a unanimous agreement to abandon nuclear warfare, it is important to understand not only the reasons which led to the development and continued maintenance of their nuclear military sections (as given in the article) but also the reasons why a Global Zero is necessary and important for the security of the global population. Further, the warfare, political power plays and hidden motives and feelings of the countries should also be considered- what are they fearing or hoping? †¢ How author defines these? For the author, these reasons revolve against geographical conflicts, defensive strategy and political decisions keeping in mind the actions of the rival countries. It appears from the article that all countries truly want to achieve a nuclear weapon free world but actions of the others are preventing them from reaching that level of trust. †¢ Does the author take any assumptions regarding these as for granted or make any questionable assumptions? The only assumption made is that the intention of the countries involved is to eventually get rid of nuclear armaments, as evidenced from explicit political statements. Even if this isn’t true, the implicit intentions cannot be judged as it would have moved the tone of the article away from neutral and factual grounds and into an opinionated piece.